 |
|
Development of Gold Circle
property |
 |
|
The proposed mixed use
development comprising office,
business, retail, service
industrial and residential land
uses totalling approximately
17,67ha in extent has activities
listed in terms of the
regulations and is subject to
basic assessment as prescribed. |
|
An application of this nature
consists of two phases. The
first phase is to obtain
environmental authorisation from
the Western Cape Provincial
Government in terms of the
National Environmental
Management Act, Act 107 of 1998
(NEMA). |
|
The second phase is the
application to the City of Cape
Town for various approvals in
terms of the Land Use Planning
Ordinance, Ord 15 of 1985
(LUPO). These are the Removal of
Restrictive Title Conditions,
the Rezoning to Sub-divisional
Area with a basket of
developmental rights, and after
these the Subdivision of the
property. |
 |
|
The consultants for Gold Circle
started the first phase of the
development application in 2009,
this culminated in October 2010
with the submission of a Final
Basic Assessment Report (BAR) to
the Department of Environmental
Affairs and Development Planning
(DEA&DP) for the environmental
authorisation. RAMPOA and
several other parties had
previously commented on the
draft BAR, but commented again
on the Final BAR on 28 October
2010. |
|
Environmental Authorisation was
granted on 16 February 2011, but
it appeared that many of our
comments had not been taken into
account, and we thus lodged an
appeal on 6 April 2010. The
appeal was not against the
authorisation in principle, but
because some of the
conditions of approval were
deemed to be inadequate. |
|
The result was that some
amendments to the Environmental
Authorisation was made on 5
March 2012. These amendments do
address our main concerns
and go a long way to meeting our
requirements. As with any
decision of this nature, we are
not 100% satisfied, but feel
that we can solve any
outstanding issues through
direct communication with the
developers and the relevant
City departments. |
|
This first phase of the
application process is now
complete and the decisions made
with respect to this phase is
final. |
 |
|
The relevant documents mentioned
above can be accessed with the
links in the column to the right |
 |
|
At the same time that the
applicant launched the
environmental authorisation
process, they also applied to
the City and Province (DEA&DP) for the
Removal of Restrictive Title
Conditions. In February 2010
advertisements were placed for
Removal of Restrictions and for
Rezoning to Sub-divisional Area
- letters of notification were
sent out to owners of
neighbouring properties and
other affected parties. Comments
and objections were received
from a number of people and
organisations and the applicant
was asked to respond to these. |
|
In November 2011 DEA&DP notified
the applicant that the Removal of
Restrictions had been approved
and requested submission of the
original Title Deeds for
endorsement. This was done and
in April 2012 the final
notification of this approval
was published in the Provincial
Gazette. The City is now waiting
for the final letter of approval
and the amended Title Deeds from
Province. |
|
The application for Rezoning to
Sub-divisional Area with a
basket of development rights as
per a Proposed Conceptual
Subdivision Plan is only now
being processed after the formal
notification of approval of
Removal of Restrictions in the
Provincial Gazette. The Planning
Department
will soon be able to submit
their recommendations to the
Spatial Planning Environmental
and Land Use Management
Committee (SPELUM) for the
Rezoning of the Property to
Sub-divisional Area. All
objections and comments relating
to this aspect of the
application, together with the
applicant's responses, will be
included in the submission to
SPELUM. |
|
Only after the rezoning has been
approved by the City, can an
application for subdivision of
the property, accompanied by
site development plans, be
formally considered. In fact our
information is that the owner of
the property has not yet
instructed the consultant
handling the above
applications to apply for
subdivision or draw up site
development plans. It is
suspected that Gold Circle may
sell the property with the
Sub-divisional Area Plan and
basket of rights in place and
that new owners will then apply
for subdivision. An application
for subdivision of at least a
portion of the land must be
submitted within 2 years of the
rezoning approval. |
|
The City has committed itself to
further consultation with
affected parties when an
application for subdivision and
site development plans are
submitted to them. |
 |
|
On 19 April 2012 we received an
email from the City setting out
the processes to date and the
current state of the
application. The email and the
Conceptual Subdivision Plan
submitted to the City can
be accessed with the links in the column
to the right. |
 |
|
RAMPOA has communicated our
concerns about aspects of the
proposals
to the City's Planning &
Building Development Management
Department, and our concerns
have been noted. The RAMPOA
chairperson was also invited to
attend a meeting with our
Councillor, the applicants and
the City Planners in which all our
concerns were again raised and
discussed. |
|
Both RAMPOA and the EMC have
made recommendations to Planning
and Building Development
Management that the Conceptual
Subdivision Plan be amended as
follows (see plan below): |
|
a) |
Currently the plan indicates a
stormwater swale and stormwater
detention ponds down the centre
of the proposed development. We
propose that this stormwater
detention system be moved to the
western boundary of the
property, i.e. adjoining the two
portions of the nature reserve,
Sandown Crescent and The
Stableyard to form a buffer
between the proposed precincts
on the property and Royal Ascot.
This will also be more
acceptable environmentally than
a swale down the centre of the
property. This area could then
be landscaped and provide public
open space with walks and play
parks similar to what we have in
Royal Ascot. |
|
b) |
The public open space joining
the northern and southern
portions of the nature reserve
at Sandown Crescent is too
small. The City’s Biodiversity
Specialists have proposed that
it should be increased from the
proposed 0.23ha to approximately
0.80ha – the corridor should be
40m wide and the entrance areas
north and south of Sandown
Crescent should each be 60m
wide. |
 |
|
|
Green: Stormwater swales &
detention ponds as proposed on
conceptual plan. |
|
|
Dark blue: RAMPOA & EMC proposal
for stormwater detention system
and public open space. |
|
|
Purple line: RAMPOA & EMC
proposal for corridor between
reserve sections – the proposed
corridor on the plan is the thin
black line under the dark blue
section. |
 |
|
One issue that is of major
concern to RAMPOA is the matter
of ensuring that our eastern
boundary is secure when Gold
Circle vacates the property.
This issue is being discussed
with the City officials, and
they are looking at mechanisms
to ensure that this boundary is
adequately fenced and secured
before the property is vacated.
As the nature reserve is City
property, they too have a vested
interest in ensuring that this
is done. |
|
At a trustees meeting on 7 May,
the committee decided to appoint
consultants to investigate the
procedures followed by the
applicant as there are
allegations that these
procedures may not have been
correct as prescribed by the
legislation. A town planner and
attorney will be appointed to go
into this matter and report to
the committee. |
 |
|
8 May 2012 |
 |
 |